Map your O1A evidence before a lawyer call turns vague.

Original contributionAdoption, citations, field use, product impact, policy use, patents, standards, or expert proof that others relied on the work. Judging or peer reviewPaper review, grant review, program committee, technical judging, competition judging, or other review of others in the field. AuthorshipScholarly articles, technical publications, major media, field articles, or papers tied to the same claimed field. Critical or essential roleA serious project or distinguished organization depended on your specific work, not just your title. High salary or remunerationReliable compensation data, contracts, equity, or organizational pay justification compared to the field. Awards, media, or membershipsSelective awards, published material about you, or memberships that require outstanding achievements.

Several outside signalsIndependent users, reviewers, citations, external experts, public adoption, press, or field organizations. Mostly internal, with some external supportThere is a real story, but outside validation still needs cleanup. Mostly internal right nowThe work may be strong, but the evidence is still employer-owned or self-described.

Yes, counsel or employer structure is clearThe main blocker is evidence packaging. Partly clearYou know the likely petitioner or work plan, but the details need counsel. No, the legal structure is unclearDo not treat a packet tool as a substitute for status, petitioner, or timing advice.

Active filing or employer deadlinePrioritize counsel plus a clean evidence map. Three to six months availableUse the window to turn informal proof into documented outside validation. Exploratory onlyUse the free guide and build proof before buying anything.