Short version: a lot of O1A cases are not too weak. They are too blurry on field definition, too generous on criteria strength, or too casual about petitioner and itinerary structure.
What this kit helps you do
- Lock one officer-readable field of extraordinary ability.
- Rank the 8 O1A criteria without pretending every arguable point is strong.
- Test whether the profile actually reads above ordinary peers.
- Check petitioner, consultation, and itinerary readiness early.
- Build an evidence map and lawyer-reviewable handoff memo.
What you get
| File | Why it matters |
|---|---|
| AI prompt pack (.md) | Runs the structure gate, field lock, criteria ranking, comparator analysis, evidence map, red-team pass, and attorney handoff flow. |
| Human guide (.pdf) | Shows the clean execution order, expected outputs, and the quality checks that keep the packet from drifting into procedural mush. |
Best fit
- Your evidence is real, but the story still feels scattered.
- You need to know which criteria are actually strong now.
- You want a cleaner packet plan before paying for deeper filing work.
- You need something more disciplined than a generic O-1 checklist.
Not the right fit
- You need legal representation.
- You want a guarantee.
- The profile still needs real accomplishment-building more than packet organization.
Useful rule: if the case feels strong because the person sounds impressive, this kit helps test whether the evidence, field definition, and petition structure actually carry that weight on paper.
Open the kit
Checkout opens on Gumroad under the current ChatEB1 seller account. Instant digital delivery. Educational product only. No legal advice.